Economic Development

            Economic development can be affected by many different forces. These forces include economic systems, political systems, and culture. All of these have an impact on how developed a country is, or will be. Economic theory predicts that a market economic system will create greater economic development than a command or mixed economy because with a market economy because the resources are owned by the private individual and they will use them most efficiently to make profits. Economic theory predicts that a democratic political system will create greater economic development than a totalitarian or partly free political system because with a democratic system the people have more incentives to innovate because they will get the rewards from it in the end. Finally, economic theory predicts that cultures with a high degree of individualism will have greater economic development because there are more incentives to innovate if the rewards of your innovation go to you rather than sharing them with a group.

 

Market

GDP per capita

 

Mixed

GDP per capita

 

Command

GDP per capita

Hong Kong

$34,200

 

Macedonia

$7,100

 

Korea, North

$1,700

Singapore

$27,800

 

 Malaysia

$9,700

 

Burma

$1,700

Luxembourg

$58,900

 

Thailand

$8,100

 

Libya

$6,700

Estonia

$14,300

 

Saudi Arabia

$12,000

 

Zimbabwe

$1,900

Ireland

$31,900

 

Senegal

$1,700

 

Turkmenistan

$5,700

New Zealand

$23,200

 

Croatia

$11,200

 

Laos

$1,900

United Kingdom

$29,600

 

Uganda

$1,500

 

Cuba

$3,000

Denmark

$32,200

 

Lebanon

$5,000

 

Iran

$7,700

Iceland

$31,900

 

Moldova

$1,900

 

Uzbekistan

$1,800

 Australia

$30,700

 

Swaziland

$5,100

 

Venezuela

$5,800

Average:

$31,470

 

Average:

$6,330

 

Average:

$3,790

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This chart clearly shows that a market economy will yield a higher GDP per capita than a mixed or command economy. The average GDP per capita is almost six times the average of a mixed economy and almost twelve times the average of a command economy. Also, even the lowest GDP per capita on the market list is higher than any countries on the mixed or command economy list. This huge difference is due to the incentives to innovate in a market economy. In a market economy, if you work hard and come up with better ways of doing things, then you get the rewards unlike in a mixed or command economy. In command economies, the government tells producers exactly what and how much to produce. There is no incentive to innovate when the rewards go to the government, not the individual. Also, in command and mixed economies, the government has strict regulations on firing employees, so an employee could just go to work and not do anything without fear of losing his or her job. Therefore, productivity is low and there is no economic development. Finally, command economies do not protect intellectual property rights, so there is no incentive to innovate because the government can come and take whatever they want and there is nothing you can do about it. The economic theory that market economies will yield greater economic development is supported by the evidence of GDP per capita.

 

Democracy

GDP per capita

 

Partly Free

GDP per capita

 

Totalitarian

GDP per capita

Austria

$31,300

 

Albania

$4,900

 

Burma

$1,700

Bahamas

$17,700

 

Bolivia

$2,600

 

Cuba

$3,000

Chile

$10,700

 

East Timor

$400

 

Libya

$6,700

Costa Rica

$9,600

 

Ecuador

$3,700

 

North Korea

$1,700

Germany

$28,700

 

Madagascar

$800

 

Saudi Arabia

$12,000

Italy

$27,700

 

Niger

$900

 

Sudan

$1,900

Poland

$12,000

 

Paraguay

$4,800

 

Syria

$3,400

Netherlands

$29,500

 

Solomon Islands

$1,700

 

Turkmenistan

$5,700

Malta

$18,200

 

Sri Lanka

$4,000

 

 

 

Portugal

$17,900

 

Turkey

$7,400

 

 

 

Average:

$20,330

 

Average:

$3,120

 

Average:

$4,512.50

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    When comparing different political systems with regards to GDP per capita, countries with democratic forms of government are the highest. The average GDP per capita is much higher in democratic governments than in partly free or totalitarian forms of government. This is because economic development comes from increases in productivity that comes from innovations. There is more incentives to innovate in a democratic form of government because if someone works hard then they get the rewards for there hard work. In a totalitarian or collectivist government, the needs of society as a whole are most important, not individuals. If someone is doing well, then the government will restrict what they are doing and get the benefits for it. There is one country in the totalitarian list that does have a higher GDP per capita than one country on the democratic list, but just by a small margin. This might be just due to chance, or the country may have a totalitarian government but have a low population with a lot of wealth in that nation. Overall, the evidence supports the economic theory that a democratic form of government will create greater economic development than a partly free or totalitarian government.

 

High Individualism

GDP per capita

 

Low Individualism

GDP per capita

Australia

$30,700

 

Guatamala

$4,200

Canada

$31,500

 

Ecuador

$3,700

Netherlands

$29,500

 

Colombia

$6,600

United Kingdom

$29,600

 

Costa Rica

$9,600

United States

$40,100

 

Venezuala

$5,800

Belgium

$30,600

 

Indonesia

$3,500

Denmark

$32,200

 

Pakistan

$2,200

France

$28,700

 

Panama

$6,900

Italy

$27,700

 

Peru

$5,600

New Zealand

$23,200

 

Taiwan

$25,300

Average:

$30,380

 

Average:

$7,340


 

This chart shows that countries with a high degree of individualism have higher GDP per capita and greater economic development. The average GDP per capita in countries with a high degree of individualism is more than three times higher than the average of countries with a low degree of individualism. Also, the country with the lowest GDP per capita in the high individualism list is still higher than country with the highest GDP per capita in the low individualism list. This is because there are more incentives to innovate in countries with high degrees of individualism. People are more inclined to work hard and produce more and produce more efficiently if the benefits go to them, not everyone as a group. The evidence supports the theory that countries with high degrees of individualism will have greater economic development than countries with low degrees of economic development.